So, please write to this guys
( abs_at_netbsd.org ) to change it, to complete it, whatever.
It took a while to get it where it is, but without any input, it stays
like it is !
cheers
Eric Dittman wrote:
>
> > At 12:08 PM 9/20/01, Emmanuel replied to my question with :
> > >http://www.netbsd.org/Documentation/Hardware/Machines/DEC/vax/sections.html
> > >;-)
> >
> > (the VAX hardware reference), however this reference is unreliable when it
> > comes to VUPs ratings.
> > Eric has confirmed that it was correct on the ones I asked about, we
> > already had the 4000/100 vs 4000/90 vs 4000/700 discussions :-)
>
> There are some inaccuracies, though. For instance, the /90 and /90A
> are shown to have the same TPS, but the /90A is faster. The numbers
> for the /90 and /90A are also wrong as far as I can tell (the numbers
> more closely match what I first posted rather than what I determined
> experimentally).
>
> There's also a lot of holes in the list.
> --
> Eric Dittman
> dittman_at_dittman.net
> Check out the DEC Ethusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/
Received on Thu Sep 20 2001 - 21:04:24 BST