>You've misinterpreted my meaning. I was responding to a poster who
>suggested that the intent underlying the development of a
>product was relevant to the appropriateness of its use. That I disagree
>with this position does not mean, as you have assumed, that
>I automatically adopt the other extreme -- that because there is an
>inappropriate use for a product, it cannot be used at all. Your
>attempt at a false dichotomy is rather transparent.
I would HOPE it was transparent... it was meant as a tongue in cheek
response. I didn't honestly think you believed in the extreme logical end
to the concept.
Sorry, I thought it would be understood as a goof when I asked for your
car. :-)
-chris
<
http://www.mythtech.net>
Received on Wed Apr 03 2002 - 01:40:54 BST