Bad Classic Operating Systems (was: Micro$oft Biz'droid Lusers)

From: R. D. Davis <rdd_at_rddavis.org>
Date: Sun Apr 21 10:15:54 2002

Quothe Richard Erlacher, spreader of pro-Microsoft propaganda, from his
writings of Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 08:07:40PM -0600:

> ... and if you're dumb enough to believe that, you'll get what you deserve.

Au contraire. Micro$oft windoze users get what they deserve.

To bring this back on-topic: in the years prior to the existence of
Micro$oft and it's viruses pretending to be operating systems, can
anyone think of any vintage operating system(s) that was (were) known
for being poorly designed, annoying to use, and dangerous to data,
which was (were) regarded with the same disdain as Micro$oft windows,
yet still had loyal lusers who apparently didn't know any better than
not to use it (them)?

-- 
Copyright (C) 2001 R. D. Davis The difference between humans & other animals: 
All Rights Reserved            an unnatural belief that we're above Nature & 
rdd_at_rddavis.org  410-744-4900  her other creatures, using dogma to justify such
http://www.rddavis.org         beliefs and to justify much human cruelty.
Received on Sun Apr 21 2002 - 10:15:54 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:34:32 BST