Micro$oft Biz'droid Lusers (was: OT email response format)

From: Richard Erlacher <edick_at_idcomm.com>
Date: Tue Apr 23 14:09:25 2002

Just for the record, I didn't say that our current Chief Executive (aka DUBYA)
is NOT a dimwit. I was referring to George I as "not a dimwit."

Dick

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Smith" <csmith_at_amdocs.com>
To: <classiccmp_at_classiccmp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:27 PM
Subject: RE: Micro$oft Biz'droid Lusers (was: OT email response format)


> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Richard Erlacher [mailto:edick_at_idcomm.com]
>
> > You may be onto something, but the use of bombastic
> > descriptors such as
> > "brain-damaged" suggest you really don't know what goes on in
> > big companies,
>
> Actually, I would argue that the term "brain-damaged" describes
> more than adequately what goes on in large companies, and most
> small ones. I would argue that, but I'm tired of arguing...
>
> > and have lost sight of the fact that not all people are the
> > brightest bulbs
>
> It's a hard fact to miss.
>
> > ... just look at our Chief Executive ... even his Papa, who
> > was considerably
> > more articluate than he is, though not a dimwit, was not
> > terribly clever.
>
>
> If you're talking about the US's president, I'm not sure I can
> agree with your classification of "not a dimwit" for him -- or
> his father, or any other politician I can think of... I'm sure
> there are one or two who aren't idiots; I just can't think of
> any.
>
> > more below ...
>
> Indeed...
>
> > > average person can watch them and make use of their vocaublary by
> > > utter such wise words as "duh, footbawl!"
>
> > Keep in mind that they're the majority of the user base.
>
> Again, that's difficult to miss.
>
> Chris
>
> Christopher Smith, Perl Developer
> Amdocs - Champaign, IL
>
> /usr/bin/perl -e '
> print((~"\x95\xc4\xe3"^"Just Another Perl Hacker.")."\x08!\n");
> '
>
>
>
Received on Tue Apr 23 2002 - 14:09:25 BST