Web Site Question (was: OT: _spam_)

From: Hans Franke <Hans.Franke_at_mch20.sbs.de>
Date: Wed Dec 4 09:00:00 2002

> On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, Sellam Ismail wrote:
> > BTW, I must say that the new site looks quite pretty.

> Thanks, but I wasn't satisfied. Since then I've moved on to other looks.
> What I need to know is this:

> Should the ClassicCmp web site look new/fancy or retro/simple?

> In a way, I want to have a simple/retro look.

> Recent ideas I've had include this one (semi-fancy):
> http://www.subatomix.com/etc/classiccmp/webdocs/
> and this one (retro):
> http://www.subatomix.com/etc/classiccmp2/

Well, I'd definitly prefer the simple style (I wouldn't
call it retro). Why ? well

1. there is even on a dual PIII 750 workstation a visible
   faster rendering process (it's instant)
2. Data size - 3 K vs. 15 K
3. last but not least, it's well usable with literaly
   any browser, including text browsers, and of course
   versions for handicaped (*1) and browsers on classic

Go for the simple one!


(*1) A special kind of handicaped are mobile users ...

VCF Europa 4.0 am 03./04. Mai 2003 in Muenchen
Received on Wed Dec 04 2002 - 09:00:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:34:39 BST