On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Robert Schaefer wrote:
> I'm sorry, I was unclear. My 1st point was that moderation will add a
> variable but possibly significant delay to posts by non list-members.
> People who might have classic hardware that must go *now*, if not to a
> good home than a bad one. Latency is already pretty bad (at least here--
> anyone else?), case in point that Bondwell that went somewhere else.
> Perhaps another collector got it, I don't know. My 2nd point was that
> moderation will give an advantage to the moderator(s) who are interested
> in the presumed hardware.
Please don't use the example of the Bondwell to promote any idea regarding
list management, let alone one that will continue to allow SPAM to be
posted to the list. The person offering it retracted it (for whatever
reason, I don't know, didn't ask, didn't care) shortly after I posted the
message to the list.
> As I mentioned in an earlier post, I really don't care about the volume of
> spam I get thru this list. I'm pretty sure that they will be delt with by
I do care.
> others far better than I could do myself. I only offered because I do see
> them as issues that should be at least examined, before a major decision
> like moderation, even limited as it is in this case, is made.
NOBODY EVER PROPOSED MODERATION!!!
I wish people would actually READ and COMPREHEND the messages written here
before responding!!!
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger
http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
Received on Sun Feb 03 2002 - 07:25:34 GMT