On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Eric Dittman wrote:
> > On the other hand, at my last business I had nothing but problems with
> > Dell and their shitty tech "support". I had the same problem others have
> > described--needing them to send a replacement part for defective hardware
> > and being asked to send in the entire unit so that it could be repaired
> > there, otherwise they would want a credit card number to secure the
> > replacement part! What kind of shit is that? Of course, this is after
> > you have to go through all the asinine motions with their support drones
> > that you've already done.
>
> Okay, let me get this straight. You bought a system without
> onsite warranty, so when they ask you to send the entire
> system in to be repaired (which is the usual business practice
> I've seen from Sony and Compaq, too), you get upset? You then
Well, aside from making lame assumptions about my experience, I don't know
what incident you are referring to.
We DID have onsite repair for the desktop. The hard drive was shot. It
was dead. Since this hard drive had important data on it, and the last
backup was a week prior, we needed to see if we could have the data
recovered so we sent it off to a local data recovery house. In the
meantime, we asked Dell to send out a tech with a new hard drive. But
they wouldn't do so after we explained we'd already sent off the hard
drive for data recovery. THEIR stupid tech support procedures were more
important than their customer's business operations.
F DELL!
> ask to get the replacement part sent to you as an advance
> replacement and you don't want to give them a credit card
> number for a deposit (which is the way most vendors handle
> advance replacement), so you get upset at that, too? I find
Bullshit. We'd been doing business with Dell for about 6 months by then
and had several orders. If they couldn't trust us by that time then screw
them. I've never had that kind of treatment from any other hardware
vendor.
F DELL!
> it entirely reasonable that Dell ask for a credit card number
> as a deposit to secure the transaction to insure you send the
> faulty part back. Most people would just trash the bad part
> and not bother with returning it once they got the good part
> if there wasn't a financial incentive.
So you've run a survey and have analyzed the results and have concluded
scientifically that this is what "people" would do? Or you're just trying
to defend Dell for the sake of nothing else to stick up for today and are
coming up with these silly arguments?
F DELL!
> It sounds like the problem is in not understanding the warranty
> and the difference between on-site and mail-in repair coverage.
> I paid extra for the on-site coverage so I don't have to worry
> about mailing my system in or providing a credit card number as
> a deposit on an advance replacement.
It sounds like someone would rather argue for the sake of arguing. I
won't doubt you had a good experience. I, on the other hand, and many
other people (a not insignificant number), have had terrible experiences
with them and that makes the company suspect on a broad level. If you
want to be Dell's cheerleader then go ahead and don the mini-skirt and
pompoms for them. Rah rah sis boom bah.
F DELL!
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger
http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
Received on Thu Jan 10 2002 - 12:02:49 GMT