--- Richard Erlacher <edick_at_idcomm.com> wrote:
> I do believe the main reason for the 68010's appearance in what was
> previously a number of 68000 applications was that it could support
> virtual memory, while that was awkward on a 68K.
That's my recollection as well.
> The early AT&T 7300's (?) which a number of my friends bought, but I
> didn't (don't ask me why),
We had a large 7300 club here - lots of Bell Labs guys bought them at
employee rates. We built a 70-computer UUCP phone tree for e-mail and
Usenet - fed in/out through AT&T (...!ihnp4!cbosgd..., later cbatt),
Ohio State (osu-cis and giza) and finally through MorningStar before
it went to PPP and the modern 'net.
> used the 68010 even though they had rather limited HDD
> resources. It would have worked better with two drives, methinks.
I know that some model of UNIX PC had room for a full-height MFM drive
under a hump (most only had room for a half-height). It was too little,
too late, but you could drop a lot more than 40Mb inside - maybe 80Mb
or more! :-)
-ethan
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
Received on Mon Jan 14 2002 - 16:26:32 GMT