LEAST valuable collectibles (was: Apple II boards

From: Gary Hildebrand <ghldbrd_at_ccp.com>
Date: Fri Jan 25 04:32:46 2002

Cameron Kaiser wrote:

> Not so much indistinct as the 1702's picture is more vivid. (No, I don't
> think it's a matter of having the tint control too low :-)

That's the magic word there . . . and that is due to using different
phosphors. I've seen some CRT's with a reddish-orange phosphor for
'red' and that would tend to give a better rendition on human flesh.
And that would sell the television set.

Gary Hildebrand
Received on Fri Jan 25 2002 - 04:32:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:34:58 BST