On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Ian Koller wrote:
> Tothwolf wrote:
> > On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Ian Koller wrote:
> > > On Fri, 25 Jan 2001, Sellam Ismail wrote:
> > >
> > > > The VCF *is* a business, genius.
> > >
> > > You've previously carefully avoided disclosing that fact. It's a
> > > business that will never see one slim dime from us. We would never
> > > recommend you to anyone. It's not because of what you charge. You may
> > > be worth every bit of that. You might even be worth ten times that.
> > > It's because in your attempts to get ahead, you do it by trying to
> > > bring others down. I bet if someone got a quote from you on a part,
> > > even at the same time you were telling everyone on the list that it
> > > wasn't worth shit, you'd be quoting it at a rate that would make you a
> > > real living. You want to take your money in, but we can tell you won't
> > > pay anyone else shit. You're a one way fuck, and you know it. That's
> > > why we will never do business with you.
> >
> > Who is this "we" you are speaking of? I certainly don't align myself with
> > *you*, Ian.
> >
> > Since I joined this last last year, many of the posts I've seen from you
> > have been nothing more than personal attacks on others and other assorted
> > ranting and raving. You seem to feel the need to show off and show that
> > you are better than everyone else. I personally find your latest postings
> > offensive and imagine a good many others here on classiccmp do as well. If
> > you feel the need to use that kind of language, take it elsewhere!
> >
> > And by the way, Ian, if you feel the need to reply to this email, do *not*
> > CC: it to me.
>
> That we didn't include you. My comments aren't for everyone, however,
> most of the time, there has been at least some that found something
> beneficial in them, but you are welcome to skip over them as you
> please.
Why did you CC: me anyway?
Anyhow, Plonk.
-Toth
Received on Sat Jan 26 2002 - 20:33:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:34:58 BST