Not-so-OT point of philosophy

From: Pat Finnegan <pat_at_purdueriots.com>
Date: Tue Jan 29 11:11:33 2002

On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Christopher Smith wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cameron Kaiser [mailto:spectre_at_stockholm.ptloma.edu]
>
> > full circle and back to low-power terminals connected to a
> > "mainframe," now
>
> Since when is a "Win2k Advanced Server host" a mainframe? :)
> That aside, though, no, it doesn't seem odd at all. It's
> certainly The Right Thing To Do, WRT administrative overhead,
> and maintenance/repair cost.

I think the point is more that "Win2k Advanced server would REQUIRE the
power of a mainframe to run smoothly".

:P

-- Pat
Received on Tue Jan 29 2002 - 11:11:33 GMT