On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Jerome Fine wrote:
> As is is, the ratio is at least 10:1, so I don't think anyone can be
> suffering that much. If we all were so concerned, we would just
> hit the DELETE key and stop making comments. PERIOD.
Or we can restrict posting to subscribers only and be done with it.
Depends on how you look at it, eh?
> I certainly would not want Sellam to take over - at least Jay takes
> the attitude that all changes should be made slowly.
Yeah, I was already talking to someone else privately regarding this.
First of all, I know I'm not the most popular guy on the list. So what.
Niether are you. But I'm still cuter. Second of all, I don't think I'd
want the job. There are too many god damned whiners on this list.
If by "slow changes" you mean something new happens every other year then
I suppose that's what we have. Also, I hate the fact that there has to be
a democracy everytime a serious issue comes up that needs addressing. I
would prefer someone to simply take reasonable action after about a day's
worth of discussion.
Not to knock Jay, at least he keeps the list running, and he deserves
lots of credit. But I don't think he even reads the list anymore, and is
not in a position to be the operator.
Ah screw it. Just like every other time an issue has come up, nothing
will happen. Let the spam come.
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger
http://www.vintage.org
* Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
Received on Fri Mar 15 2002 - 15:13:38 GMT