urgent business/investment deal

From: Douglas Quebbeman <dhquebbeman_at_theestopinalgroup.com>
Date: Sat Mar 16 07:49:36 2002

> >Douglas Quebbeman wrote:
>
> > Sure, but SPAM is at least partly pervasive due to the low cost
> > of harvesting addresses. This might bump it into the unprofitable
> > zone...
>
> I have asked for comments on the following - does anyone care?

I think your solution is somewhat Byzantine. Why not just
edit your headers to something that can't be replied to
by output from a harvester?

Regards,
-dq
Received on Sat Mar 16 2002 - 07:49:36 GMT