[CCTALK] Rants, List Bifurcation

From: John Boffemmyer IV <john_boffemmyer_iv_at_boff-net.dhs.org>
Date: Fri May 17 06:48:03 2002

Ok Ray, you can shut up now. This has nothing to do with anything really
except the search for attention and obvious stupidity. You win at that
front and I may even go as far as nominating you for a Darwin award (with
ignorance such as yours, I'm more than sure something life threatening will
be brought upon itself with you - grabbing bare wires, bitching out an
armed assailant, stepping in front of a bus, etc. - ok, I can hope). And
since you've proven your complete worthlessness as a human being, I must
now a) put you on my filter of idiots to ignore and b) report you to the
Church of Scientology; I am pleased to tell you that you've made such an
ass out of yourself that you'd fit right in. Congratulations jerk.

Jay, you're right and I hope something can be done about this waste of
zygote. Glen: you're right again. I hope my comments made you feel a little
better about this post string.

-John

At 07:13 AM 5/17/02, you wrote:
>On Friday 17 May 2002 00:14, you wrote:
> > > From: Raymond Moyers <rmoyers_at_nop.org>
> > >
> > > I understand the thinking behind bifurcation of the list,
> > > but this wont quell the foamy mouth shout-down/shoot-down
> > > crowd that lay claim to that manufactured "civil" right
> > > to protection against speech that they find offensive.
> >
> > Jay --
> >
> > I find Mr. Moyers' speech to be offensive in the context of this list.
>
>"...The Left's First Amendment would read 'Congress shall make
>no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, etc. ... providing
>such speech or activities do not offend. If any offense is
>taken, citizen whiners, being necessary to the security of a
>politically correct state, shall from time to time suppress the
>offender's free speech rights by any means necessary, including,
>but not limited to, required sensitivity training, re-education,
>and loss of income'." --Edwin Feulner
>
> "If winning is the only value, why debate when you can suppress?"
> --John Leo
>
> "'No tolerance' means more than just a warning, because that would
> mean tolerance." --Dry Creek Elementary School Principal Darci Mickle,
> of Centennial, Colorado, discussing seven fourth-graders sent home from
> school, then sentenced to a week's lunchtime detention, for violating
> "zero tolerance" policies; the boys, playing a game of soldiers and aliens,
> pointed their fingers like firearms during the mock battles.
>
> A lot has been said about the "good Germans, who said nothing"
> what is missing from most of it is why they were silent and how
> they where silenced,
>
> "Being a lover of freedom, when the [Nazi] revolution came,
> I looked to the universities to defend it, knowing that they had
> always boasted of their devotion to the cause of truth;
> but no, the universities were immediately silenced.
>
> Then I looked to the great editors of the newspapers,
> whose flaming editorials in days gone had proclaimed their
> love of freedom; but they, like the universities, were silenced in a
> few short weeks....
>
> Only the Church stood squarely across the path of Hitler's
> campaign for suppressing the truth.
>
> I never had any special interest in the Church before, but
> now I feel a great affection and admiration for it because
> the Church alone has had the courage and persistence
> to stand for intellectual and moral freedom.
>
> I am forced to confess that what I once despised I now praise
> unreservedly." --Albert Einstein
>
> Its a tactic of the left to purge any casual mention of their bloodstained
> past from all forums the same way the NAZIs silenced their opposition
> in the last days of the Wiemar republic.
>
> All lists have their brushfires and posts that look like bait, but the
> fires consume their fuel and extingush themselves, and even the
> most intrangent will soon enough notice he is off in the ditch
> and steer himself back between the stripes.
>
> Those of us that are accustomed to American freedom, and what
> that means grant latitude to the voice and actions of others
> automatically, knowing that the license we grant to others
> directly supports our own.
>
> In my opinion, i would have routed those clamoring for "control"
> to /dev/null , once you act on the desires of the control freaks
> you empower them with the ability of the always used tactic
> of making such a clamor that you in effect hand over all power
> to them to shut them up. a tactic that works all too often.
>
> Raymond
>
>_______________________________________________
>cctalk mailing list
>cctalk_at_classiccmp.org
>http://www.classiccmp.org/mailman/listinfo/cctalk

----------------------------------------
Founder, Lead Writer, Tech Analyst
and Web Designer Boff-Net Technologies
http://boff-net.dhs.org/index.html
---------------------------------------
Received on Fri May 17 2002 - 06:48:03 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:35:16 BST