So what you're saying is, you want a magic "on-topic/off-topic" filter. Which
basically comes down to the list being 100% moderated. Which is something
people have said they don't want, and I agree... You can't have your cake and
eat it too, Sellam. If you want to get rid off all the off-topic stuff,
you're going to miss some on-topic stuff that gets caught in the noise no
matter what method you choose. If we were using your proposal, you would be
bitching because people wouldn't be 100% self-policing. Please make your
choice and stop whining. I'm really sick of hearing about how the list change
didn't turn out to be implemented according to your pet idea of how the list
should be run.
Really, this applies to everyone who keeps complaining, not just Sellam. I
think Jay did a great job with the list change, and we should all give it a
couple months (at least) to see how well it works before starting a new round
of proposals for changing the list.
Sellam Ismail said:
> On Fri, 17 May 2002, Jay West wrote:
>
> > Here's how it is currently handled. In the scenario that Sellam puts forth,
> > no - the reply from someone on cctalk to a post that originated on cctech
> > will NOT go back to cctech. You can't have it both ways people - either the
> > people on cctech see posts on cctalk or they don't. The people who have
> > joined cctech did so specifically because they DIDN'T want to see posts on
> > cctalk. As a result, I'm sure not going to force them to see posts on
> > cctalk. (more below)
>
> The problem is that many relevant (and on-topic) replies will be missed by
> those on CCTECH, thereby penalizing them for not wanting to see off-topic
> crap.
>
> I'd always envisioned that everyone would be subscribed to CCTECH,
> and then anyone who wanted to start an off-topic thread or continue a
> thread that has gone off-topic could move over to CCTALK to take it up
> there. THOSE folks could subscribe to both lists so that they could have
> a place to blab all they wanted.
>
> That's what I thought this whole upgrade was about.
>
> > Yes, it will work, but the responsibility is the choice of the list member,
> > not mine. If one wants to see posts on both, they should join both lists.
> > However, keep in mind that most people won't want to join both, they will
> > only want one or the other. In the end, it's the users choice.
>
> What's the point of CCTECH then?
>
> Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
>
> * Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
- Dan Wright
(dtwright_at_uiuc.edu)
(
http://www.uiuc.edu/~dtwright)
-] ------------------------------ [-] -------------------------------- [-
``Weave a circle round him thrice, / And close your eyes with holy dread,
For he on honeydew hath fed, / and drunk the milk of Paradise.''
Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Kubla Khan
Received on Mon May 20 2002 - 10:28:34 BST