You're right, of course. I refer to Win9x as Windows, and 'NT as 'NT. Not
everybody does that. I've applied patches to NT a couple of times, not to
mention installing extensions. Sorry to generate the confusion.
Dick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Hellige" <jhellige_at_earthlink.net>
To: <classiccmp_at_classiccmp.org>
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: APPLEVISION Monitor
> >Windows patches??? We don't need no stinkin' patches. There aren't any
...
> >you have to buy the next version ... OTOH, when MS distributes new DLL's,
they
> >come with the app's that require them and, if you choose to install such an
> >app, the updated files are automatically installed for you, whether you
like
> >it or not. (Backup recommended in case you don't like the outcome!)
>
> There certainly are enough of them if you run anything based
> on NT or MS Exchange. The release of new patches is almost nonstop,
> not to mention the huge service packs as well. The funny thing is,
> most of them seem to be so-called 'security' fixes.
>
> Jeff
> --
> Home of the TRS-80 Model 2000 FAQ File
> http://www.cchaven.com
> http://www.geocities.com/siliconvalley/lakes/6757
>
>
Received on Mon May 06 2002 - 17:50:46 BST