OT: Re: Going OT Re: (no subject)

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Eric Dittman <dittman_at_dittman.net>
Date: Tue Feb 18 08:19:30 2003

> > Okay, for a legal-as-in-U.S.-courts, what do they call
> > evidence that is circumstantial in nature that requires a
> > leap of faith to be true?
>
> Conjectural.

Hurray, someone provides a real answer to the question!

-- 
Eric Dittman
dittman_at_dittman.net
Check out the DEC Enthusiasts Club at http://www.dittman.net/

Received on Tue Feb 18 2003 - 08:19:30 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Richard A. Cini: "WTD: Missing R-E issues wanted"
Previous message: Eric Dittman: "Full-blown OT: Re: OT: Re: Going OT Re: (no subject)"
In reply to: Wayne M. Smith: "OT: Re: Going OT Re: (no subject)"
Next in thread: Vintage Computer Festival: "OT: Re: Going OT Re: (no subject)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:35:55 BST