OT: Re: Going OT Re: (no subject)

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Wayne M. Smith <wmsmith_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Tue Feb 18 02:13:00 2003

> Okay, for a legal-as-in-U.S.-courts, what do they call
> evidence that is circumstantial in nature that requires a
> leap of faith to be true?
> --

Conjectural.
Received on Tue Feb 18 2003 - 02:13:00 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Lawrence Walker: "Going OT Re: (no subject)"
Previous message: Doug Coward: "RS-232 Problem (Configuration ?)"
In reply to: Eric Dittman: "OT: Re: Going OT Re: (no subject)"
Next in thread: Lawrence Walker: "OT: Re: Going OT Re: (no subject)"
Reply: Lawrence Walker: "OT: Re: Going OT Re: (no subject)"
Reply: Eric Dittman: "OT: Re: Going OT Re: (no subject)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:35:55 BST