On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Hans Franke wrote:
> > I would agree, which is why I have been saying "known". But, until those
> > machines materialize, the fact is that there are less KNOWN Lisa 1's in
> > existence than Apple-1's. I would not doubt that there are more out
> > there (and would be willing to accept that there are many more), but until
> > they come forward, we can only go off of what is known.
>
> Which is rather in favor for unnatural high prices.
Of course, but then that's the nature of valuation. You can speculate
that there are 50,000 Lisa 1's out there but then to factor "those" in to
any valuation would be misleading. You shouldn't base prices on the
possibility of more being out there just as you shouldn't go to war
against a country based on the possibility that it might have weapons of
mass destruction (har har).
> > Sure, I can agree with that in general. But where are they? And if you
> > just spent $10,000 on a computer that had crappy disk drives that failed
> > most of the time, and Apple was offering you a FREE upgrade (the Apple-1
> > deal was TWO Apple-1 boards for ONE Apple ][) then wouldn't human nature
> > dictate that such an offer would be taken by most people (where "most"
> > means ">98%")? So your number may well be inflated.
>
> The same I'd say for Apple 1s.. he who got an Apple 1 and could get
> an A2 with just a few bucks more would have done so.
No, he who had ***TWO*** Apple 1's could get an Apple ][. Let me repeat:
TWO Apple-1's. The Lisa upgrade was ***FREE***, as in ***NO CHARGE***, as
in ***FREE***. Apple even paid shipping both ways. Quite a bit of
difference.
> > > BTW: Good Morning
> > Go to sleep!
>
> Still at work.
Gehst du zu haus!
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
Received on Tue Nov 11 2003 - 12:41:47 GMT