Aquarius II on eBay didn't sell at over $400

From: Pete Turnbull <pete_at_dunnington.u-net.com>
Date: Mon Jan 19 16:31:12 2004

On Jan 19, 20:49, Witchy wrote:

> > PS. Fix your mailer! Yours are the only messages that default to
reply to
> > you and the list (boo!)
>
> Nothing to do with me I don't think - I'm on bog-standard outlook
2000 here
> and haven't changed settings for years.

It *is* your mailer. It appears to be putting an unneccessary
"Reply-to:" header in, and when the list software sets its "Reply-To:",
it gets concatenated to yours instead of replacing it:

From: "Witchy" <witchy_at_binarydinosaurs.co.uk>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk_at_classiccmp.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:49:49 -0000
Message-ID: <EAELLACDNKNOEIOECBEEOEJBEJAA.witchy_at_binarydinosaurs.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="us-ascii"
X-BeenThere: cctalk_at_classiccmp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
Reply-To: witchy_at_binarydinosaurs.co.uk,
   "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
        <cctalk_at_classiccmp.org>

Given your Outlook puts in the correct "From:" header, adding a
"Reply-To:" is redundant and arguably incorrect.

For a short while, late last year, I had my MUA add a "Reply-To:" and
the result was exactly the same. A few other people had the same
problem, and appear to have fixed it.

-- 
Pete						Peter Turnbull
						Network Manager
						University of York
Received on Mon Jan 19 2004 - 16:31:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:36:46 BST