> -----Original Message-----
> From: cctalk-bounces_at_classiccmp.org
> [mailto:cctalk-bounces_at_classiccmp.org]On Behalf Of Pete Turnbull
> Sent: 19 January 2004 22:31
> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
> Subject: Re: Aquarius II on eBay didn't sell at over $400
>
> It *is* your mailer. It appears to be putting an unneccessary
> "Reply-to:" header in, and when the list software sets its "Reply-To:",
> it gets concatenated to yours instead of replacing it:
I know microsloth stuff has a mind of its own, but if I've not changed
anything since well before pre-upgrade days and both my 'from' and
'reply-to' addresses are the same what more can I do? Nobody else I mail has
this problem. I also can't be the only Outlook 2000 user here, can I? Could
it not also be a problem with the list software since it never used to do it
before?
> Given your Outlook puts in the correct "From:" header, adding a
> "Reply-To:" is redundant and arguably incorrect.
I'll have a nose through the options, but I doubt 'include from AND reply-to
address when replying to mails' is in there. It's microsloth, what more can
I say :)
> For a short while, late last year, I had my MUA add a "Reply-To:" and
> the result was exactly the same. A few other people had the same
> problem, and appear to have fixed it.
I wonder how.....
cheers
--
Adrian/Witchy
www.binarydinosaurs.co.uk - possibly the UK's biggest online computer museum
www.snakebiteandblack.co.uk - ex-monthly gothic shenanigans :o(
Received on Mon Jan 19 2004 - 17:03:47 GMT