Why should the real hardware necessarily outperform it? With
processors getting faster and faster,
I wouldn't be surprised if an emulated hp2000 runs rings around the real h/w.
It's too bad the emulator doesn't have the blinky lights and the
presence of a real hp2k though.
-Bob
>Jay asked about benchmarks for SIMH running HP2000 Access,
>
>Here's a quick chain test for doing 255 (+-) chains with timing for my
>SIMH configuration as described (about 23 sec.) I would hope that
>real hardware
>would out perform it. If not I'll have to think about what could be wrong with
>the simulator and come up with another test. Let me know what you
>get, Jay, next
>time you have her up.
>
>Thanks again,
>Mike.
>
>list
>CHATST
>
>10 COM A$[255]
>20 IF LEN(A$)=255 THEN 70
>30 IF LEN(A$)#0 THEN 50
>40 PRINT TIM(0),TIM(4)
>50 A$[LEN(A$)+1]="A"
>60 CHAIN X,"chatst"
>70 PRINT TIM(0),TIM(4)
>80 END
>run
>
>CHATST
>
> 39 22
> 39 45
>
>DONE
>cat
> NAME LENGTH RECORD NAME LENGTH RECORD NAME LENGTH RECORD
>BTEST 1 CATT AL 5 63 CHATST C 1
>DT 1 FPTS9 2 HI 1
>KLFW 1 PR0 AL PR0 64 ROS00 AL 7 63
>SIGNIN 1 SUM 1 WORLD 1
--
bbrown_at_harpercollege.edu #### #### Bob Brown - KB9LFR
Harper Community College ## ## ## Systems Administrator
Palatine IL USA #### #### Saved by grace
Received on Fri Jan 30 2004 - 09:43:39 GMT