On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 09:40:13 +0000, Jules Richardson
<julesrichardsonuk_at_yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> (Interestingly, there seems to be a huge drive toward wireless at the
> moment, and people only find out how slow and unreliable it is when it's
> too late - all I've heard from real installations so far are horror
> stories and nothing along the lines of "oh yeah, it works fine")
>
Interesting, because we have LOTS of wireless here at Virginia Tech
and oh yeah, it works fine. I'm on a wireless connenction right now.
The house I live in is 175 years old and is on the Federal Register of
Historic Places. The walls are 16" thick brick - even the interior
walls. Because the building is protected, I couldn't run a wired
network, so we went with wireless. It works fine, even through the
very thick walls and floors.
I think that wireless installations that are slow and/or unreliable
probably have configuration issues or interference from other sources.
Received on Thu Jul 08 2004 - 07:04:47 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:36:50 BST