On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 14:01:01 +0100
"Rob O'Donnell" <classiccmp.org_at_irrelevant.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
> At 13:04 08/07/2004, Christopher McNabb wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 09:40:13 +0000, Jules Richardson
> ><julesrichardsonuk_at_yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > > (Interestingly, there seems to be a huge drive toward wireless at
> > > the
> >
> >I think that wireless installations that are slow and/or unreliable
> >probably have configuration issues or interference from other
> >sources.
>
>
> I have wireless here, but it's only for a single laptop that gets
> carted all about the house. Everything else is mostly connected by
> Cat5 Ethernet, at 100Mbps. It works OK...
>
My wireless network here really exists only because it was a 'why not?'
proposition recently. The cheap Linksys router I was using to share my
DSL connection died for some reason, and it turned out to be just as
cheap to buy one now with a wireless port on it. At the same time I
bought the cheapest wireless card I could find. I connect an almost
on-topic (quite old) Toshiba 486 laptop with it for portable web access.
Wireless gateways are so cheap that for me one ended up being a free
add-in.
Received on Thu Jul 08 2004 - 18:12:20 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:36:50 BST