HP 6101x and PCIB

From: Ethan Dicks <dickset_at_amanda.spole.gov>
Date: Fri Jul 9 20:57:49 2004

On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 05:41:42PM -0700, Al Kossow wrote:
> This is another reason why PC based test equipment is a Bad Thing.
>
> Here are lots of nice digitizing scopes, power supplies, signal generators,
> and DMMs that are totally useless because all of the UI was done through
> a '86 vintage PC and a interface that never caught on.

I have a Northwest Instruments 68000 bus analyzer that has an IBM 5150
front end. I have to keep the PC working or it's useless. I don't even
know if it would work with a faster machine, but even then, I'd top out
at something with an ISA slot.

I'm equally stuck with my B&C Microsystems UP600A device programmer... It
does _not_ work with even a 25MHz '386. I'm sure there's a dumb timing loop
somewhere. I have theorized that it might work on a board that has a turbo
switch (with the switch set to non-turbo mode), and the bus turned down as
slow as the BIOS allows, but I've never sat down and run the necessary tests.
It's easier to keep a '286 around. It works on an 8MHz machine and that's
what matters most.

My question, though, is what's the alternative to PC-based test equipment?
Completely self-contained proprietary stuff?

-ethan

-- 
Ethan Dicks, A-130-S      Current South Pole Weather at 10-Jul-2004 01:40 Z
South Pole Station
PSC 468 Box 400       Temp -97.5 F (-72.0 C)    Windchill   -139.4 F (-95.2 C)
APO AP 96598          Wind    10 kts Grid 055   Barometer 667.3 mb (11107. ft)
Ethan.Dicks_at_amanda.spole.gov     http://penguincentral.com/penguincentral.html
Received on Fri Jul 09 2004 - 20:57:49 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:36:50 BST