FW: RK05 question

From: Ethan Dicks <dickset_at_amanda.spole.gov>
Date: Mon Jul 12 20:44:04 2004

On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 08:34:22PM -0400, David V. Corbin wrote:
> More seriously. I wonder how good the rotational stability is on the drive.
> Mny of the reasons for using "hard sectored" media was because a) Drives
> "wobbled", and b) Accurate timing electronics were "difficult".

I'd say it was because at the time, the predominant methods were either
hard-sectoring (which is easy to key off of), or, for multiple platter
drives, a servo *surface*. When you have only a single platter, filling
the bottom surface with servo data kills your capacity.

Also, keep in mind that the RK11-C, an early Unibus RK05 (RK03?) controller
was made of several dozen "FLIP-CHIP" modules. Any design decisions that
could keep that controller as small as possible would be a big win in terms
of manufacturing cost. The RK8E was several quad-height boards (approx one
square foot each).

The RL01 came out a few years later with embedded among the sectors. This
was a pretty good advance in drive technology. It's handy that the same
packs were used with both the RL11 and RL8A controllers. At the time I
first started getting into OMNIBUS PDP-8s (1984), I chose to go with an
RL01 ($150 shipped) and an RL8A (~$600) rather than an RK8E ($450?) and
adding another RK05 to the one I already had. Even in 1984, finding a
16-sector pack wasn't easy, but RL01Ks were available for nearly nothing
(businesses were switching to RL02s) 5MB per drive (RL01) vs 2.5MB (RK05)
was nice, too.

-ethan
 
-- 
Ethan Dicks, A-130-S      Current South Pole Weather at 13-Jul-2004 01:30 Z
South Pole Station
PSC 468 Box 400       Temp -98.7 F (-72.5 C)    Windchill   -134.1 F (-92.3 C)
APO AP 96598          Wind   6.8 kts Grid 103   Barometer 670.5 mb (10985. ft)
Ethan.Dicks_at_amanda.spole.gov     http://penguincentral.com/penguincentral.html
Received on Mon Jul 12 2004 - 20:44:04 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:36:50 BST