vintage computers and lead poisoning?
>>> But a worm is not a virus.
>> What's the difference?
> Worms propagate specifically by travelling over networks. Viruses
> (not 'virii' - learn Latin to know why)
Actually, given the hackish tendency to use `inappropriate' plural
forms (VAXen, cabeese, polygoose), I find its surface Latinity and deep
non-Latinity to be reasons to use, not reasons to avoid, "viri" and
"virii".
> can use a network to get from machine to machine, but they require
> some level, however minimal, of human assistance to load.
But where does "human assistance" end?
Presumably "installing $VULNERABLE_SOFTWARE" (say, unpatched IIS)
doesn't count, but, say, clicking on a vector email in Outlook does.
So what about setting Outlook up to check mail every five minutes (and
auto-display the first new mail when there is new mail)? What about
turning on javascript support in $WEB_BROWSER? What about setting up a
procmail rule to run email to a certain address through an
autoresponder program, when the autoresponder in question has a bug
that allows carefully crafted messages to execute arbitrary code? What
about installing an "upgrade" that reopens an old hole?
I guess it just seems to me like a pointless distinction, a difference
that makes no difference.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse_at_rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Received on Fri Jun 04 2004 - 23:17:59 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:36:55 BST