On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Zane H. Healy wrote:
> > > I have PCs running windows because I must, but I don't need the latest
> > > and greatest Microsoft offering, I am running Windows NT4.0 with Office
> > > 95 (which btw will soon be covered by the 10 year boundary :-).
> >
> > I expect the 10 year boundary for the list may be revised soon ;)
>
> Maybe the list simply needs to take a firm non-Windows stance, or else
> specifically OK non-Windows HW that would otherwise be blocked by the 10
> year (or whatever it might get expanded to) rule.
>
> I for one don't care to see any posts about Windows, but wouldn't object to
> posts about say the Amiga OS 4.0 beta or an SGI Tezro.
I think that's a bit absolute. In 6 years, when Windows 3.0 will be 20
years old, if someone wishes to set up a Windows 3.0 box for a historical
exhibit, it should be perfectly acceptable to discuss that here.
(I told you exceptions will apply ;')
--
Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
[ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage Computers ]
[ and academia at www.VintageTech.com || at http://marketplace.vintage.org ]
Received on Tue Jun 15 2004 - 22:43:30 BST