character codes, was RE: Really stupid PDP assembler question

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Tom Jennings <tomj_at_wps.com>
Date: Sun Jun 27 02:44:08 2004

On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 14:44, Tony Duell wrote:

> The fact that 5 bits allows the complete alphabet is probably the real
> reason...

I'm sure you are right.
Received on Sun Jun 27 2004 - 02:44:08 BST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Paul Williams: "manuals in pdf (resolution, compression)"
Previous message: Tom Jennings: "character codes, was RE: Really stupid PDP assembler question"
In reply to: Tony Duell: "character codes, was RE: Really stupid PDP assembler question"
Next in thread: der Mouse: "character codes, was RE: Really stupid PDP assembler question"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:37:01 BST