bit-widths, was Re: HP Laserjet ..again....

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: William Donzelli <aw288_at_osfn.org>
Date: Wed Sep 22 15:55:35 2004

> Not in this community! Newfangled usage, yes.

Well, if newfangled means after 7 April 1964.

William Donzelli
aw288_at_osfn.org
Received on Wed Sep 22 2004 - 15:55:35 BST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Paul Koning: "bit-widths, was Re: HP Laserjet ..again...."
Previous message: Patrick/VCM SysOp: "(OT) archiving as opposed to backing up"
In reply to: Paul Koning: "bit-widths, was Re: HP Laserjet ..again...."
Next in thread: Tom Jennings: "bit-widths, was Re: HP Laserjet ..again...."
Reply: Tom Jennings: "bit-widths, was Re: HP Laserjet ..again...."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:37:31 BST