http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1307810,00.html
That's one of the articles , make your own mind up.
Geoff.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe R." <rigdonj_at_cfl.rr.com>
To: "Geoffrey Thomas" <geoffreythomas_at_onetel.com>; "General Discussion:
On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk_at_classiccmp.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: I don't believe it!!! Jeanne
> At 05:56 AM 9/23/04 +0100, you wrote:
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Vintage Computer Festival" <vcf_at_siconic.com>
> >To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
> ><cctalk_at_classiccmp.org>
> >Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 2:20 AM
> >Subject: Re: I don't believe it!!! Jeanne
> >
> >
> >> On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Geoffrey Thomas wrote:
> >>
> >> > According to my Observer newspaper , Nader gets a lot of funding from
> >Mr.
> >> > Bush's backers.
> >> > So who were you really voting for ?
> >>
> >> Read between the lines. Ask yourself, "why?" It's more cynical than
you
> >> think.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer
> >Festival
> >
> >Yes I know , the paper said that they're funding Nader because he pulls a
> >lot of Democrat votes rather than Republican , thus swinging things
Bush's
> >way.
>
> Exit polls have CONSISTANTLY shown that Nader takes more votes away
from
> the Republican than from the Democrats. I've heard CLAIMS that the
> republicans secretly finance Nader but I neve seen any proof and I don't
> beleive the claims.
>
> Joe
Received on Thu Sep 23 2004 - 17:37:31 BST