Somewhat OT: libg++ source, version 2.4.5 anyone....?

From: Roger Merchberger <zmerch_at_30below.com>
Date: Fri Feb 4 15:54:54 2005

Rumor has it that Mike Loewen may have mentioned these words:
>On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Jules Richardson wrote:
>
>>
>>Long shot... I don't suppose anyone happens to have source for libg++
>>v2.4.5 on an old Linux distro do they?
>>
>>I've got gcc 2.4.5 up and running on the Tek (I've just got xfractint
>>built and working on it, yay!). Despite the various GNU mirrors carrying
>>all versions of gcc though, none of them seem to carry a version of
>>libg++ prior to 2.7 though.
>
> Would libg++-2.4 work?

Know what distro it might've come with? I have Caldera OpenLinux 2.2, 2.3
and 1.3, Redhat 6.2, 7.[0-2] and SuSE 7.0 Pro available handy here....

Unforch, I don't have time to scour the disks right now -- maybe tonite,
tho. I'll keep you informed...

Laterz,
Roger "Merch" Merchberger

--
Roger "Merch" Merchberger   | A new truth in advertising slogan
sysadmin, Iceberg Computers | for MicroSoft: "We're not the oxy...
zmerch_at_30below.com          |                         ...in oxymoron!"
Received on Fri Feb 04 2005 - 15:54:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:37:35 BST