HDL vs. schematics (was Re: ebay - cardamatic)
I wrote:
> For a complicated system, I find well-written HDL code to be easier to
> understand than schematics. ^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^
Tom wrote:
> Umm, Eric, your standards are likely too high :-) "well written"
> is the key to any of it. I've seen great code in FORTRAN IV and
> assembler macros and BASIC, just not very often :-)
And there are well-drawn schematics that are a joy to use, and
spaghetti schematics that are almost totally useless.
Eric
Received on Wed Feb 16 2005 - 14:02:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:37:38 BST