Not sure if I understand the final part of your statement... would you agree,
or not, that within a few years (or possibly right now) we'd also have to
include the earliest versions of Windows (and other early GUI shells) that were
still just DOS underneath?
>
> This is exactly why I'm not opposed to DOS being discussed on the list. It
> comes from the days of the traditions I speak of above, before 90% of the
> cpu and memory was dedicated to a pretty gui.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jay West
=====
Tell your friends about the Computer Collector Newsletter!
-- It's free and we'll never send spam or share your email address
-- Publishing every Monday(-ish), ask about writing for us
-- Mainframes to videogames, hardware and software, we cover it all
-- W:
http://news.computercollector.com E: news_at_computercollector.com
-- 665 readers and counting!
Received on Sun Jan 30 2005 - 14:38:47 GMT