suggestion for list sanity?

From: Richard Erlacher <edick_at_idcomm.com>
Date: Wed Mar 10 23:04:17 1999

was that really "list" or was that a typo . . . "LOST" ???

Dick

----------
> From: Jim Strickland <jim_at_calico.litterbox.com>
> To: Discussion re-collecting of classic computers
<classiccmp_at_u.washington.edu>
> Subject: suggestion for list sanity?
> Date: Tuesday, March 09, 1999 12:58 PM
>
> I was wondering if it would be possible to add an "OT subgroup" to
classiccmp
> that people can choose to subscribe to or not. That way when something
goes
> as far afield as the operating system discussion or the argument about
guns
> in times past, those who wish to participate can simply agree to post to
the
> off-topic board and not irritate those who don't wish to participate.
Might
> be a good place for auction foo, too, although an additional subgroup for
that
> would also work. Would this be possible, oh list admin?
> --
> Jim Strickland
> jim_at_DIESPAMMERSCUMcalico.litterbox.com
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Vote Meadocrat! Bill and Opus in 2000 - Who ELSE is there?
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wed Mar 10 1999 - 23:04:17 GMT