Planning for an equipment move...

From: Allison J Parent <allisonp_at_world.std.com>
Date: Sat Mar 13 21:22:53 1999

<From CLASSICCMP-owner_at_u.washington.edu Sat Mar 13 16:24:50 1999
<Return-Path: <CLASSICCMP-owner_at_u.washington.edu>
<Received: from lists4.u.washington.edu by world.std.com (TheWorld/Spike-2.0
< id AA06221; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 16:24:41 -0500
<Received: from host (server_at_lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13])
< by lists4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP
id NAA1
< Sat, 13 Mar 1999 13:24:35 -0800
<Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]
< by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP
id NAA4
< for <classiccmp_at_lists.u.washington.edu>; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 13:24:31
-0800
<Received: from mail.30below.com (mail.30below.com [12.15.88.1])
< by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with SMTP id
NAA317
< for <classiccmp_at_u.washington.edu>; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 13:24:30 -0800
<Received: (qmail 32229 invoked from network); 13 Mar 1999 22:13:53 -0000
<Received: from zmerch.30below.com (HELO zmerch) (12.15.88.12)
< by mail.30below.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 1999 22:13:53 -0000
<Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19990313163735.00950790_at_mail.30below.com>
<Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 16:37:35 -0500
<Reply-To: classiccmp_at_u.washington.edu
<Sender: CLASSICCMP-owner_at_u.washington.edu
<Precedence: bulk
<From: Roger Merchberger <zmerch_at_30below.com>
<To: "Discussion re-collecting of classic computers" <classiccmp_at_u.washingto
<Subject: Re: Planning for an equipment move...
<In-Reply-To: <v04011706b3107923550c_at_[192.168.1.2]>
<References: <19990313191751.18176.qmail_at_brouhaha.com>
< <990313110353.20200677_at_trailing-edge.com>
<Mime-Version: 1.0
<Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
<X-Sender: zmerch_at_mail.30below.com
<X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 beta -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
<Status: R
<
<Once upon a midnight dreary, Zane H. Healy had spoken clearly:
<
<>in the back of my current pickup. I'm wondering if the smaller pickups
<>along the lines of a Chevy S-10 can handle that.
<
<Altho they did make longbox (8 foot) boxes on the S-10 line, they're prett
<tough to find. Otherwise, an S10 will fit anything 6 foot even... or maybe

I have a toyota (1982!) and with the gate down 8Ft items are no problem.
It has in the last year moved 12 VS3100s, 15 Vt320s, 8 S100 crates and
atlest 8 8" disk pairs, several racks 8 assorted telvideo unknown number
of printers and monitors. If I could get it in it or on it, it moved.

<Weight-wise - I've found the S10 line to be quite capable. They're standar
<1/2-ton, but I've had over 3/4 ton in the back of mine, once... I pulled

Same with the toyota, the Chevy LUV (it was the predecessor to S10).
So considering I drive 100mi a day with it at 162,000 its solid enough.

Pickup trucks regardless of the size are really great for moving computer
hardware and the Vans or their kin are a good second choice. Weight is not
a limiting factor as more often you cube out first.

Allison
Received on Sat Mar 13 1999 - 21:22:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:32:20 BST