<Yes, but apparently it's freely distributable. And in the absence of a
<license, I think that implies that derived works are freely distributable
<as well. My hypothetical reverse-engineerined "source code" would obviousl
<be a derived work.
I'd say if it was done non-profit and protpper credit given there would be
little room for squawks. I have no idea if that would fly legally, however
intent is sometimes important.
Allison
Received on Tue Mar 23 1999 - 21:16:46 GMT