OT: patenting an old year/date concept, to make millions
>OK, that just how the date was entered, not how it was stored internally,
>but it's not that different. I would claim this is certainly 'prior art'.
>And I doubt if this is the first time it was done either.
Just because it was done before doesn't mean that a patent won't
be granted, especially when it comes to patenting algorithms. Witness
the discussions in comp.arch earlier this year about IBM patenting
a well-known (has been in textbooks since the 1960's) algorithm for
converting multi-digit decimal numbers to binary.
Tim.
Received on Fri Nov 12 1999 - 19:57:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:32:29 BST