On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 01:14:04PM -0700, healyzh_at_aracnet.com wrote:
> You know why the SHOW SYSTEM display had to have the "system uptime"
> field increased beyond 999 days.
And did the system had to be rebooted in order to apply this fix? :-)
> You know where NT stores its data if they really need it to be saved
What does this one mean?
> You do not expect the previous version of your file to be destroyed by
> the new one
Yeah when I first heard of journaling filesystem development for Linux,
I thought that was the whole point... but I guess not.
>
> You know RMS does not mean 'root mean square'
No, it's Stallman's initials, silly. (but I got an EE degree too,
so actually it could mean either one)
> The concept of a blue screen of death is foreign to you
Hmmm, that's one of the screen hacks in xscreensaver isn't it?
> You don't exit your editor when you leave for a two week vacation
I thought that was the sign of an emacs bigot?
--
_______ Shawn T. Rutledge / KB7PWD ecloud_at_bigfoot.com
(_ | |_) http://www.bigfoot.com/~ecloud kb7pwd_at_kb7pwd.ampr.org
__) | | \________________________________________________________________
Get money for spare CPU cycles at http://www.ProcessTree.com/?sponsor=5903
Received on Tue Oct 03 2000 - 16:26:11 BST