MS-DOS version (was: What's best to do?? classically speaking

From: Vance Dereksen <vance_at_ikickass.org>
Date: Sat Jun 23 23:48:06 2001

Actually, didn't IBM come out with PC-DOS 7.0, then 7.1, then 7.3, then
8.0, then Y2K patch it to make PC-DOS 2000?

Peace... Sridhar

On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Bill Pechter wrote:

> > > > How about 6.00, 6.10, 6.20, 6.21, 6.22, 6.23, and 6.30? Well, THOSE
> > > > are OT for this list.
> > On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Sellam Ismail wrote:
> > > 6.23, 6.30??? I thought the last MS-DOS maintenance upgrade was 6.22.
> > > What happened after 6.22?
> >
> > Ooops. 6.23 was a typo. I don't think that there was ever such. Sorry
> > about that. 6.22 is the last release from MICROS~1 that I'm aware of,
> > although internally, WIN95 is 7.00, WIN98 is 7.10, ...
> >
> > PC-DOS 6.30 was IBM's version of MS-DOS 6.2x
> > (PC-DOS 6.10 was IBM's version of MS-DOS 6.00)
> >
> > --
> > Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin_at_xenosoft.com
>
> IBM came out with PC-DOS 7.0 (now renamed PC-DOS 2000).
> They made it y2k compliant and all that.
>
> Works great with WfW3.11 or Win3.11 and OS/2 on top.
>
> Bill
> ---
> Bill Gates is a Persian cat and a monocle away from being a
> villain in a James Bond movie -- Dennis Miller
> bpechter_at_shell.monmouth.com|pechter_at_pechter.dyndns.org
>
Received on Sat Jun 23 2001 - 23:48:06 BST