MS-DOS version (was: What's best to do?? classically speaking

From: Bill Pechter <pechter_at_bg-tc-ppp896.monmouth.com>
Date: Sat Jun 23 17:34:38 2001

> > > How about 6.00, 6.10, 6.20, 6.21, 6.22, 6.23, and 6.30? Well, THOSE
> > > are OT for this list.
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Sellam Ismail wrote:
> > 6.23, 6.30??? I thought the last MS-DOS maintenance upgrade was 6.22.
> > What happened after 6.22?
>
> Ooops. 6.23 was a typo. I don't think that there was ever such. Sorry
> about that. 6.22 is the last release from MICROS~1 that I'm aware of,
> although internally, WIN95 is 7.00, WIN98 is 7.10, ...
>
> PC-DOS 6.30 was IBM's version of MS-DOS 6.2x
> (PC-DOS 6.10 was IBM's version of MS-DOS 6.00)
>
> --
> Grumpy Ol' Fred cisin_at_xenosoft.com

IBM came out with PC-DOS 7.0 (now renamed PC-DOS 2000).
They made it y2k compliant and all that.

Works great with WfW3.11 or Win3.11 and OS/2 on top.

Bill
---
  Bill Gates is a Persian cat and a monocle away from being a 
  villain in a James Bond movie              -- Dennis Miller 
  bpechter_at_shell.monmouth.com|pechter_at_pechter.dyndns.org
Received on Sat Jun 23 2001 - 17:34:38 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:34:00 BST