ArcNet and the Pursuit of Multiple Topologies

From: ajp166 <ajp166_at_bellatlantic.net>
Date: Wed Oct 10 17:38:51 2001

Ah, you forgot the other transport, IP over morse code(cw).

I believe RICM may have a copy of the document.

Allison



-----Original Message-----
From: Iggy Drougge <optimus_at_canit.se>
To: Derek Peschel <classiccmp_at_classiccmp.org>
Date: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: ArcNet and the Pursuit of Multiple Topologies


>Derek Peschel skrev:
>
>>On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 11:29:12PM +0000, Pete Turnbull wrote:
>>>
>>> Nope. The RFC exists (RFC 1149) and there has been a practical
>>> implementation. See http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/
>
>>For a moment I wondered if the Web site was set up using the same
protocol
>>(as a proof of concept?) but luckily it's just a normal Web site. :)
>
>Well, there should be high latency, but the packet sizes should be quite
good.
>=)
>
>--
>En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.
>
>Goto: A programming tool that exists to allow structured programmers to
>complain about unstructured programmers.
>
>
Received on Wed Oct 10 2001 - 17:38:51 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:34:18 BST