Jeff Hellige skrev:
>>128 and 128D to be exact. I love the 128D, too bad Commodore waited so long
>>to finally get it right.
> I tend to use 'C-128' to refer to either of them, though the
>128D is different in some respects. I don't believe there's much, if
>anything, that requires one over the other. I also like the 128D but
>have often wondered why they used such a hefty connector for the
>keyboard.
Because they didn't have the sense to serialise the keyboard data, I suppose.
OTOH, they keyboard is very light for its age.
--
En ligne avec Thor 2.6a.
Received on Mon Oct 29 2001 - 10:15:43 GMT