Solaris 2.4

From: Ethan Dicks <erd_6502_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Thu Dec 5 10:21:00 2002

--- Carlos Murillo <carlos_murillo_at_epm.net.co> wrote:
> ...But I did remember that Sun
> had played a retroactive trick on version numbers. I also remember
> the Great Recompile/ReBuy that we had to go through when we
> went from SunOS(BSD) to Solaris (SYSV). And all of the hard drives
> suddenly became insufficient...

Yep. That's pretty much how it was.

I heard enough horror stories from guys at Ohio State about Solarises
2.1 through 2.3 that I intentionally sat on the sidelines until I was
forced to go with Solaris 2.4. By then, the worst of it had passed.
I didn't have any real complaints about it or 2.5.1.

-ethan



__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Received on Thu Dec 05 2002 - 10:21:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:34:39 BST