Solaris 2.4

From: Kelly Fergason <kfergaso_at_swbell.net>
Date: Thu Dec 5 18:46:00 2002

Despite all the horror stories, even 2.1 wasn't that bad.
I ran a production Solaris 2.1 server at Amoco
back in 92. Sparc 10 boot and application server.
Ran fine for 3 years before natural business politics upgraded it.

Kelly


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ethan Dicks" <erd_6502_at_yahoo.com>
To: <cctalk_at_classiccmp.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: Solaris 2.4



>
> I heard enough horror stories from guys at Ohio State about Solarises
> 2.1 through 2.3 that I intentionally sat on the sidelines until I was
> forced to go with Solaris 2.4. By then, the worst of it had passed.
> I didn't have any real complaints about it or 2.5.1.
>
> -ethan
>
Received on Thu Dec 05 2002 - 18:46:00 GMT