On Sat, 18 May 2002, Sellam Ismail wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2002, Gordon Zaft wrote:
>
> > I am not subscribed to cctech so I couldn't say what happens.
>
> Well, currently, as far as I can tell, nothing is happening on CCTECH
> because everyone is waiting for the the list split to start working in the
> way intended. But CCTECH will be pointless until one of the previously
> described methods is implemented to make sure CCTECH subscribers are
> seeing all on-topic messages.
>
> Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer Festival
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> International Man of Intrigue and Danger http://www.vintage.org
>
> * Old computing resources for business and academia at www.VintageTech.com *
If this has been suggested, I missed it. But it seems that a simple
solution would be for messages originated in CCTECH to carry a
`Reply-To: cctech_at_classiccmp.org' line instead of the `cctalk' one that they
presently do. This would put the reply back to the originating group and
keep the originator in the dialogue loop, and following the current
protocol the reply would then be forwarded to cctalk.
- don
Received on Sat May 18 2002 - 14:15:35 BST