-- Purdue Universtiy ITAP/RCS Information Technology at Purdue Research Computing and Storage http://www-rcd.cc.purdue.edu > > >From: "Patrick Finnegan" <pat_at_purdueriots.com> > > > >On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Jim Keohane wrote: > > > >> =====excerpt=2====================== > >> > >> A 6502 task context > >> would therefore require moving about 1KB, which would take about 4,500 > >> instructions (at one instruction per cycle.) On a circa-1980's machine, > >> with a 1MHz clock, that would take about 4.5 msec. > > > >This gives me awfully devious ideas... First, were there any 'multitasking > >machines' designed around the 6502? If you wanted to do multitasking, it > >seems like you could design a fairly simple MMU that would swap out the > >zero-page and stack (or all of the memory pages) for different ones, > >depending on the running task. Leaving only a few registers that need to > >be saved, it would leave a very small overhead for task swapping. You > >could even implement kernel and user mode into the MMU, making it swap > >pages automatically on an interrupt or 'memory write' to signal a syscall > >(and a swapping of pages, interrupt to the CPU and transition to 'kernel > >mode'). > > > >I think I'm going to need to start playing with designing a 6502-based > >machine now... Or maybe I should just get back to working on putting > >machines into racks so I have some floorspace around here to work in. > > > >Pat > >-- > >Purdue Universtiy ITAP/RCS > >Information Technology at Purdue > >Research Computing and Storage > >http://www-rcd.cc.purdue.eduReceived on Mon Feb 10 2003 - 22:47:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:35:54 BST