Fw: Insect Conductivity - language?

From: Geoffrey Thomas <geoffreythomas_at_onetel.com>
Date: Sun Aug 1 14:59:02 2004

OK. That makes more sense. I was referring to your finely worded cuss being
an art form.
Familiarity , however, does breed contempt . Judicious use is essential.

Geoff.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Vintage Computer Festival" <vcf_at_siconic.com>
To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
<cctalk_at_classiccmp.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 12:20 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Insect Conductivity - language?


> On Sat, 31 Jul 2004, Geoffrey Thomas wrote:
>
> > It sounds like you're agreeing with what I said ?
>
> Nope, the exact opposite.
>
> You said:
>
> "the school that believes that swearing is an art form ( not ark B ) and
> if it is used indiscriminately it loses it's impact."
>
> My point was that the act of swearing, whether in amounts copious or
> meager, has no more effect on its impact than does a bad copy of the Mona
> Lisa on the art of painting.
>
> --
>
> Sellam Ismail Vintage Computer
Festival
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> International Man of Intrigue and Danger
http://www.vintage.org
>
> [ Old computing resources for business || Buy/Sell/Trade Vintage
mputers   ]
> [ and academia at www.VintageTech.com  || at
http://marketplace.vintage.org  ]
>
Received on Sun Aug 01 2004 - 14:59:02 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 23:36:32 BST