For PAPER, the importance is reflection, rather than emmision......
But you are assuming that radiation is bad.....How else would I get this
good amber tan [with a slightly green tint]???/
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: cctalk-bounces_at_classiccmp.org
>>> [mailto:cctalk-bounces_at_classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of Hans Franke
>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 1:11 PM
>>> To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
>>> Subject: Re: <Silly> RE: Help with question about web page access
>>>
>>> Am 17 Aug 2004 13:06 meinte David V. Corbin:
>>> > >>> [mailto:cctalk-bounces_at_classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of
>>> Ed Kelleher At
>>> > >>> 11:23 AM 8/17/2004, you wrote:
>>> > >>> > >>> Subject: Re: Help with question about web page access
>>> > >>> > >>>
>>> > >>> > >>> At 10:49 AM 8/17/2004, you wrote:
>>> > >>> > >>> >WHY DOES SOMEBODY HAS TO SLAP A TINY TINY
>>> UNREADABLE FONT
>>> > >>> > >>> IN MY FACE?
>>> > >>> > >>>
>>> > >>> > >>> It takes less bandwidth and server space.
>>> > >>> > >>>
>>> > >>> >Um...NO...not at all....
>>>
>>> > >>> Well certainly then because of reduced X radiation
>>> from the CRT.
>>> > >>> The smaller fonts disturb less phosphor.
>>> > >>> You'd probably get increased life from your CRT also
>>> in that case.
>>>
>>> > Well...It could be, but is the person uses a dark font on a light
>>> > background [IMHO as it should be], then the increased area of
>>> > backgound actually increases radiation!
>>>
>>> Are you shure? I mean, if a light backgroung emmits more
>>> radiation, then we should switch for black paper as sonn as
>>> possible.
>>>
>>> Gruss
>>> H.
>>> --
>>> VCF Europa 6.0 am 30.April und 01.Mai 2005 in Muenchen
>>> http://www.vcfe.org/
>>>
Received on Tue Aug 17 2004 - 12:26:51 BST