Am 19 Aug 2004 10:17 meinte Fred Cisin:
> > > A convenience, NOT A SAFETY! , "All-OFF" is trivial to implement with X10.
> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Hans Franke wrote:
> > Fred, I beg to differ.
> > For a workplace, an ALL-OFF switch is a safty measure, and
> THAT is why I explicitly recommended X10 for CONVENIENCE,
> BUT NOT FOR SAFETY.
> Howzbout:
> A CONVENIENCE "All-OFF" is trivial to implement with x10;
> it is NOT SUITABLE for SAFETY.
> Sorry that what I wrote was misinterpreted.
Ey, always blame it on my bad english that I missunderstood you. :)
And more important, on me answering a mail, before reading all others in a thread!
Gruss
H.
--
VCF Europa 6.0 am 30.April und 01.Mai 2005 in Muenchen
http://www.vcfe.org/
Received on Thu Aug 19 2004 - 13:09:46 BST